The comparison between 2DE-MS and bottom-up LC-MS demands high-end techniques for both technologies

Electrophoresis. 2022 Jun;43(11):1242-1245. doi: 10.1002/elps.202200036. Epub 2022 Apr 11.

Abstract

In contrast to bottom-up LC-MS only 2DE-MS can separate and detect a huge number of human protein species. Kwiatkowski et al. (in this issue) established parameters to estimate the amount of protein speciation for each human protein. Proteins identified in 2DE-MS approaches showed more protein speciation than in bottom-up LC-MS. The authors state that protein speciation is likely to increase the chance of proteins to be determined in 2-DE/MS, though admitting that low-sensitivity 2DE-MS methods were used in this study. In agreement with Kwiatkowski et al., we are convinced that the difference between 2DE-MS and bottom-up LC-MS will disappear, if high-resolution 2DE is combined with identification by a high-sensitivity LC-Orbitrap-MS. Meta-analysis of proteomic data is surely a promising tool, though the technological progress in 2DE and MS has to reach a plateau to enable useful comparisons.

Keywords: 2DE-MS; bottom-up MS; protein speciation; protein species; top-down MS.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Chromatography, Liquid / methods
  • Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional / methods
  • Humans
  • Proteome*
  • Proteomics* / methods
  • Tandem Mass Spectrometry / methods

Substances

  • Proteome