Endoscopic Treatment for Pediatric Esophageal Stenosis Induced by Chemical Burn, Congenitally, or After Surgical Repair of Esophageal Atresia

Bingyi Zhou; Hailing Peng; Liu Han; Chengbai Liang; Liang Lv; Xuehong Wang; Deliang Liu; Yuyong Tan

doi:10.3389/fped.2022.814901

Endoscopic Treatment for Pediatric Esophageal Stenosis Induced by Chemical Burn, Congenitally, or After Surgical Repair of Esophageal Atresia

Front Pediatr. 2022 Feb 25:10:814901. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.814901. eCollection 2022.

Authors

Bingyi Zhou^{1

2}, Hailing Peng^{1

2}, Liu Han^{1

2}, Chengbai Liang^{1

2}, Liang Lv^{1

2}, Xuehong Wang^{1

2}, Deliang Liu^{1

2}, Yuyong Tan^{1

2}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
² Research Center of Digestive Disease, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic treatment for congenital pediatric esophageal stenosis or pediatric stenosis that develops after a chemical burn or surgical repair of esophageal atresia.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 15 pediatric patients who underwent endoscopic treatments (dilation and/or stenting and/or incision) for congenital esophageal stenosis or esophageal stenosis that developed after a chemical burn or surgical repair of esophageal atresia, between January 2010 and January 2019. The patients were periodically followed-up to assess the safety and efficacy of treatment by comparing the diameter of stricture and dysphagia score before and after procedures, and complications or recurrence.

Results: All children successfully underwent the procedures. Fourteen of the 15 patients received endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) as the first step of treatment, but EBD alone only resolved the symptoms in two patients. The remaining patients received other comprehensive treatments, such as EBD with endoscopic incision (EI), EBD with stent replacement, or a combination of EBD, stent replacement, and EI. Eleven (11/15, 73.3%) patients experienced symptomatic relief after endoscopic treatment, and recurrence was noted in four patients on 3-36 months after the final endoscopic treatment. All four patients underwent esophageal surgery to relieve their symptoms. Until October 2021, all patients experienced symptom relief, and their dysphagia scores decreased from 3-4 to 0-1 during the follow-up period of 8-121 months. The average diameter of stenosis was increased from 0.34 cm (range 0.2-0.7 cm) to 1.03 cm (range 0.8-1.2 cm). No severe complications occurred during endoscopic treatment and follow-up.

Conclusions: Endoscopic treatment is safe and effective for pediatric esophageal stenosis that is congenital or induced by chemical burns or surgical repair of esophageal atresia. Comparative large-scale studies are required to confirm our findings.

Keywords: endoscopic balloon dilation; endoscopic incision; endoscopic stent replacement; endoscopic treatment; esophageal atresia; esophageal stenosis.