Cervical disc prostheses need a variable center of rotation for flexion / extension below disc level, plus a separate COR for lateral bending above disc level to more closely replicate in-vivo motion: MRI-based biomechanical in-vivo study

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 8;23(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05121-2.

Abstract

Background: Cervical disc prostheses are used to preserve motion after discectomy, but they should also provide a near-physiological qualitative motion pattern. Nevertheless, they come in many completely different biomechanical concepts. This caused us to perform an in-vivo MR-based biomechanical study to further investigate cervical spine motion with the aim to gain new information for improving the design of future cervical arthroplasty devices.

Methods: Fifteen healthy volunteers underwent MRI-investigation (in order to avoid radiation exposure) of their cervical spines from C3 to C7; for each segment centers of rotation (COR) for flexion / extension were determined from 5 different positions, and CORs for lateral bending from 3 different positions. The motion path of the COR is then described and illustrated in relation to the respective COR for maximum flexion / extension or lateral bending, respectively, and the findings are translated into implications for a better biomechanical prosthesis-design.

Results: The COR for flexion / extension does not remain constant during motion. The CORs for the respective motion intervals were always found at different positions than the COR for maximum flexion /extension showing that the COR moves both along the x- and the y-axis throughout flexion / extension. For lateral bending a completely independent COR was found above disc-level.

Conclusion: Flexion / extension is not a simple circular motion. Disc prostheses need a variable COR for flexion / extension below disc level with the capability to move both along the x- and the y-axis during motion, plus a second completely independent COR for lateral bending above disc level to closely replicate in-vivo motion. These findings are important for improving the biomechanical design of such devices in the future.

Keywords: Cervical arthroplasty; Cervical disc prostheses; Cervical spine biomechanics; In-vivo kinematic study.

MeSH terms

  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Cervical Vertebrae* / diagnostic imaging
  • Cervical Vertebrae* / physiology
  • Cervical Vertebrae* / surgery
  • Humans
  • Intervertebral Disc* / diagnostic imaging
  • Intervertebral Disc* / physiology
  • Intervertebral Disc* / surgery
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Range of Motion, Articular / physiology
  • Rotation