Sargasso Sea bacterioplankton community structure and drivers of variance as revealed by DNA metabarcoding analysis

PeerJ. 2022 Feb 28:10:e12835. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12835. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Marine microbes provide the backbone for pelagic ecosystems by cycling and fixing nutrients and establishing the base of food webs. Microbial communities are often assumed to be highly connected and genetically mixed, with localized environmental filters driving minor changes in structure. Our study applied high-throughput Illumina 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing on whole-community bacterial samples to characterize geographic, environmental, and stochastic drivers of community diversity. DNA was extracted from seawater collected from the surface (N = 18) and at depth just below the deep chlorophyll-a maximum (DCM mean depth = 115.4 m; N = 22) in the Sargasso Sea and adjacent oceanographic regions. Discrete bacterioplankton assemblages were observed at varying depths in the North Sargasso Sea, with a signal for distance-decay of bacterioplankton community similarity found only in surface waters. Bacterial communities from different oceanic regions could be distinguished statistically but exhibited a low magnitude of divergence. Redundancy analysis identified temperature as the key environmental variable correlated with community structuring. The effect of dispersal limitation was weak, while variation partitioning and neutral community modeling demonstrated stochastic processes influencing the communities. This study advances understanding of microbial biogeography in the pelagic ocean and highlights the use of high-throughput sequencing methods in studying microbial community structure.

Keywords: 16S rRNA; Biogeography; Marine microbial diversity; Neutral modelling.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aquatic Organisms
  • Bacteria / genetics
  • DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic*
  • Microbiota* / genetics
  • Oceans and Seas
  • Seawater / chemistry

Grants and funding

This work was supported by a small research grant from the College of Charleston. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.