Estimating chikungunya virus transmission parameters and vector control effectiveness highlights key factors to mitigate arboviral disease outbreaks

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 Mar 4;16(3):e0010244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010244. eCollection 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Viruses transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes have greatly expanded their geographic range in recent decades. They are considered emerging public health threats throughout the world, including Europe. Therefore, public health authorities must be prepared by quantifying the potential magnitude of virus transmission and the effectiveness of interventions.

Methodology: We developed a mathematical model with a vector-host structure for chikungunya virus transmission and estimated model parameters from epidemiological data of the two main autochthonous chikungunya virus transmission events that occurred in Southern France, in Montpellier (2014) and in Le Cannet-des-Maures (2017). We then performed simulations of the model using these estimates to forecast the magnitude of the foci of transmission as a function of the response delay and the moment of virus introduction.

Conclusions: The results of the different simulations underline the relative importance of each variable and can be useful to stakeholders when designing context-based intervention strategies. The findings emphasize the importance of, and advocate for early detection of imported cases and timely biological confirmation of autochthonous cases to ensure timely vector control measures, supporting the implementation and the maintenance of sustainable surveillance systems.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aedes*
  • Animals
  • Arbovirus Infections* / epidemiology
  • Chikungunya Fever* / epidemiology
  • Chikungunya Fever* / prevention & control
  • Chikungunya virus*
  • Disease Outbreaks / prevention & control
  • Mosquito Vectors

Grants and funding

FJ is funded by Santé publique France (www.santepubliquefrance.fr) through a doctoral fellowship. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.