Comparison of the Treatment Efficacy of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy and Intermittent Hemodialysis in Patients With Acute Kidney İnjury Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

Fatma Yılmaz Aydın; Emre Aydın; Ali Kemal Kadiroglu

doi:10.7759/cureus.21707

Comparison of the Treatment Efficacy of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy and Intermittent Hemodialysis in Patients With Acute Kidney İnjury Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

Cureus. 2022 Jan 29;14(1):e21707. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21707. eCollection 2022 Jan.

Authors

Fatma Yılmaz Aydın¹, Emre Aydın², Ali Kemal Kadiroglu³

Affiliations

¹ Internal Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, TUR.
² Nephrology, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, TUR.
³ Nephrology: Intensive Care, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, TUR.

Abstract

Introduction and aim Acute kidney injury (AKI) is part of the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in critically ill patients and is a common condition in intensive care units (ICUs). Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is the cornerstone of treatment for AKI in critically ill patients. This patient population has a high mortality rate despite RRT. There are two methods of RRT for patients in ICUs: intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Both CRRT and IHD similarly provide adequate metabolic control. We aimed to compare these two RRT modalities in terms of ICU stay, mortality, and laboratory recovery in these patients with high mortality. Materials and methods A total of 120 patients with AKI who needed RRT in the ICU were included in the study (CRRT, n:40; IHD, n:80). Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS)-II scores at the time of admission to the ICU were calculated. Mean arterial pressure, urea, creatinine, sodium, potassium, calcium, pH, lactate, and bicarbonate levels were measured before and after dialysis. Patients were classified as living and deceased. Factors affecting the length of stay in the intensive care unit and 30-day mortality were evaluated. The variability in laboratory parameters between groups before and after dialysis was examined. The groups were compared with these parameters. Results Sixty-one point seven percent (61.7%, n:74) of the patients were female. The mean age was 62.90±13.64 years. At the time of admission to the ICU, the patients' SAPS II score was 45.05±12.76, APACHE II score was 22.05±6.32, and SOFA score was 8.26±2.48. 66.7% (n:80) of the patients included in the study died, and the length of stay of these patients in the ICU was 12.85±10.23 days. When the groups were compared, SAPS II, APACHE II scores, and SOFA scores were significantly higher in the CRRT group than in the IHD group (p:0.038, p:0.015, p:0.027, respectively). Although the length of stay in the ICU was shorter in the CRRT group, it was not statistically significant (p:0.075). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of mortality (p: 0.891). SAPS-II, APACHE II, and SOFA score affected 30-day mortality while age, gender, and RRT modalities were not associated with mortality. The improvement in laboratory parameters between the pre and post-RRT groups was statistically more significant in the IHD group (p<0.001). It was determined that there was a statistically greater decrease in mean arterial pressure in the IHD group (p<0.001). Conclusions It was determined that there was no difference between the CRRT and IHD modalities applied in patients with AKI admitted to the ICU in terms of mortality and length of stay in the ICU. It was observed that both modalities improved on laboratory parameters, but the improvement was greater in the IHD group. However, it was determined that there was a statistically greater decrease in mean arterial pressure in the IHD group.

Keywords: acute kidney injury; continuous renal replacement therapy (crrt); intensive care unit; intermittent hemodialysis; mortality; renal replacement therapy (rrt).