Background: Active surveillance (AS) with delayed intervention has gained acceptance as a management strategy for small renal masses (SRMs). However, during AS, there is a risk of tumor growth. Thus, we aim to investigate whether tumor growth in patients with SRMs leads to tumor progress.
Methods: In this study, we enrolled 16,070 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database with T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) between 2004 and 2017. The 16,070 patients were divided into three groups: 10,526 in the partial nephrectomy (PN) group, 2768 in the local ablation (LA) group, and 2776 in the AS group. Associations of tumor size with all-cause and cancer-specific mortality were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression models.
Results: Four tumor size categories were delineated (≤1, >1-2, >2-3, and > 3-4 cm in diameter), and 10-year all-cause and cancer-specific mortality both significantly increased with increasing tumor size in the PN, LA, and AS groups (all p < 0.05). Tumors were substaged based on diameter: T1aA (≤2 cm) and T1aB (>2-4 cm). All-cause and cancer-specific mortality were significantly higher in T1aB tumors than T1aA tumors in each group (hazard ratio = 1.395 and 1.538, respectively; all p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Tumor growth relates to worse prognosis of T1a RCC, and 2 cm serves as a size threshold that is prognostically relevant for patients with T1a RCC. Because of the lack of accurate predictors of tumor growth rate, AS for patients with SRMs incurs a risk of tumor progression.
Keywords: SEER; intervention; outcome; small renal masses; tumor size.
© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.