During surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), the most important prognostic factor is the absence of residual tumor. Invisible microscopic peritoneal metastasis (mPM) are not removed during surgery and can be responsible of peritoneal recurrences. The aim of this current systematic review is to assess the role of fluorescence in evaluating mPM in EOC. We performed a systematic review using bibliographic citations from PubMed, Clinical Trials.gov, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. MeSH terms for fluorescence, EOC and peritoneal carcinomatosis were combined and not restricted to the English language. The final search was performed on September 1rst, 2021. The primary outcome was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of fluorescence. We also reviewed the different techniques used. Eighty-seven studies were identified. Of these, 10 were included for analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of fluorescence ranged between 66.7-100% and 54.2-100%, respectively. Most importantly, the negative predictive value (NPV) ranged from 90 to 100% Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, no consensus was reached concerning the optimal use of fluorescence in terms of type of dye, type and timing of injection and imager to use. No adverse event was reported. Fluorescence can safely be used in EOC to evaluate mPM with a high NPV. However, a randomized controlled trial is needed to homogenize current practice.
Keywords: Epithelial ovarian cancer; Fluorescent imaging; Peritoneal carcinomatosis; Systematic review.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.