The current stratification model of aneurysm rupture seems to be insufficient in some clinical cases. In our study, we determined the differences in wall structure between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. We obtained computed tomography angiograms and categorized them into the following three groups, consisting of 49 patients each: the group with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA), symptomatic (sAAA), and asymptomatic (aAAA). The three-dimensional AAA anatomy was digitally reconstructed for each patient through semi-automatically obtained segmentation, and each aneurysm was distinguished by the following three parameters: AFL (aneurysm flow lumen), ILT (intraluminal thrombus), and calcifications. The AFL volume was greater in rAAA compared with aAAA (p = 0.004), the ILT volume was greater in aAAA than in rAAA (p = 0.013), and the AFL/ILT surface ratio was bigger in rAAA than in aAAA (p < 0.001), sAAA than in aAAA (p = 0.033), and rAAA than in sAAA (p = 0.016). AFL/ILT surface*100 was defined as an independent predictive factor of rAAA to aAAA (OR 1.187; 95% CI 1.099-1.281), to sAAA (OR 1.045; 95% CI 1.004-1.087), and in sAAA vs. aAAA (OR 1.067; 95% CI 1.017-1.119). Consequently, the wall of rAAA differs significantly from unruptured aneurysms. The AFL/ILT surface ratio might indicate an increased risk of aneurysm rupture and the occurrence of symptoms in AAA.
Keywords: abdominal aortic aneurysm; aneurysm risk rupture; aneurysm wall structure.