Background: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of steerable sheaths compared with fixed-curve sheaths on the procedural outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation guided by robotic magnetic navigation (RMN).
Methods and results: In this retrospective case-control study, 110 patients scheduled for AF catheter ablation were enrolled and divided into two groups. Fifty-five patients (paroxysmal, 70%) were treated with RMN-guided ablation utilizing a steerable sheath and another 55 patients (paroxysmal, 70%) were ablated with RMN using a fixed-curve sheath. Clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups. Compared with the fixed-curve sheath group, the steerable sheath group procedure time (111.9 ± 25.2 vs. 90.4 ± 20.7 min, p < .001) and radiofrequency (RF) time (35.9 ± 9.0 vs. 30.5 ± 7.4 min, p < .001) were significantly shortened. Additionally, the navigation index was significantly improved (0.41 ± 0.06 vs. 0.48 ± 0.08, p < .001) in the steerable sheath group. By employing a large catheter loop for targeting the right pulmonary veins (PVs), the steerable sheath group significantly reduced the RF delivery time (15.0 ± 3.0 vs. 12.0 ± 2.1 min, p < .001) during right-side PV isolation (PVI). However, total fluoroscopy time was similar between the two groups (5.6 ± 2.6 vs. 5.0 ± 2.0 min, p > .05). Acute PVI success rates were similar between the two groups. No major or minor complications occurred in either group.
Conclusion: Appropriate utilization of steerable sheath technology can improve the efficiency of AF ablation guided by RMN, primarily by reducing the total procedure and RF delivery times of right-side PVI without compromising safety.
Keywords: atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; magnetic navigation; steerable sheath.
© 2022 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.