The (apparent) antibody paradox in COVID-19

Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2022 Apr;18(4):335-345. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2022.2044797. Epub 2022 Mar 10.

Abstract

Introduction: The immunological response to COVID-19 is only partly understood. It is increasingly clear that the virus triggers an inappropriate host inflammatory reaction in patients experiencing severe disease.

Areas covered: The role of antibodies in COVID-19 remains to be fully defined. There is evidence for both protection and harm in different clinical syndromes triggered by SARS-CoV-2. Many patients dying from COVID-19 had both high titers of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and elevated viral loads. The uncertain protective role of humoral immunity is mirrored by the lack of benefit of therapeutic convalescent plasma infusions in COVID-19. In contrast, there is increasing evidence that a vigorous T-cell response is protective. Delayed or low avidity T cell reactions were seen in patients suffering severe COVID-19.

Expert opinion: These observations suggest T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 are the dominant long-term protective mechanism following either infection or vaccination. The magnitude and quality of the antibody response is likely to reflect underlying T cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Much of what has been learned about COVID-19 will need to be revised following the recent rapid emergence and dominance of the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; T cells; antibodies; monoclonal antibodies; vaccination.

MeSH terms

  • Antibodies, Neutralizing
  • Antibodies, Viral
  • COVID-19 Serotherapy
  • COVID-19* / therapy
  • Humans
  • Immunization, Passive
  • SARS-CoV-2

Substances

  • Antibodies, Neutralizing
  • Antibodies, Viral

Supplementary concepts

  • SARS-CoV-2 variants

Grants and funding

This paper was not funded.