Understanding the environmental and economic impacts of copper hydrometallurgy throughout the whole life cycle is necessary for sustainable development of the copper industry. In this study, the environmental impacts and economic costs throughout the two major copper hydrometallurgical routes in China, including heap leaching and heap-agitation leaching, are analyzed and compared using the life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost (LCC) technique. The life cycle inventory compiled from the annual statistics of the Muliashi Copper Mine, and the data regarding energy and materials process are based on the GaBi databases. The environmental impacts are quantified into 12 indicators. The results show that compared with heap leaching route, heap-agitation leaching route reduces 36.8% of abiotic depletion potential (ADP elements), but increases over half of cumulative energy demand (CED), marine aquatic ecotoxicity potential (MAETP) and human toxicity potential (HTP). Furthermore, the stage of electrowinning and agitation leaching contributes the largest environmental impact to heap leaching and heap-agitation leaching route, respectively. This is mainly due to huge consumption of electricity and sulfuric acid. The analysis of economic cost reveals that heap leaching route needs internal cost of $3225/t Cu and external cost of $426/t Cu. Compared with heap leaching route, heap-agitation leaching route increased the internal and external cost by 18.9% and 54.2%, respectively. But the economic return from heap-agitation leaching is double that from heap leaching. Together, these results indicate heap-agitation leaching has a larger environmental impact and higher economic benefit than heap leaching, which is helpful for the government to design ecological compensation policies in the balance between ecological environment and economic development.
Keywords: Copper hydrometallurgy; Economic impacts; Environmental impacts; LCA; LCC; Leaching.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.