Forensic entomology aids investigations using insects and is primarily associated with the estimation of post-mortem interval (PMI). Studies have shown that human DNA can be recovered from the crops of fly larvae. While several factors regarding the recovery of human DNA from crops have been studied, DNA extraction methods have not been thoroughly assessed. Determining a method for optimal extraction could aid crime laboratories in implementing DNA extraction from larvae and streamlining future research. Bovine DNA was used as a substitute for human DNA to test several DNA extractions kits. Four DNA extraction kits (Chelex®, PDQeX forensicGEM, EZ1® DNA Investigator, DNeasy® Powersoil® Pro Kit) were evaluated based on the quantity and quality of bovine DNA extracted. Extractions were performed on whole fly larvae and dissected crops. Quantification was performed using real-time PCR (qPCR) on a StepOne™ Real-Time PCR System with SYBR® Green using bovine-specific cytochrome b primers. The quality of extracts was determined by checking for inhibition using commercial qPCR chemistries with an internal PCR control (IPC). When using whole fly larvae, Powersoil® Pro yielded the highest average DNA yield (n = 10, 0.668 ± 0.458 ng/μl), while EZ1® DNA Investigator yielded the highest average with crops (n = 10, 0.605 ± 0.403 ng/μl). Chelex and forensicGEM yielded low amounts of bovine DNA, and its extracts were inhibited, unlike EZ1® and Powersoil® Pro, which have purification steps. Therefore, it is recommended to use EZ1® DNA Investigator coupled with automation on EZ1® Advanced XL to recover DNA from fly larvae crops.
Keywords: DNA extraction; bovine DNA; crop; fly larvae; forensic entomology.
© 2022 American Academy of Forensic Sciences.