Introduction: Upon completion of the workup for stroke, etiology cannot be identified in approximately one-third of the patients, with an embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) accounting for around 50% of these cryptogenic etiologies. Whether management of complex long-term monitoring in order to detect suspected atrial fibrillation (AFib) could be initiated and managed through a neurologist is not sufficiently investigated.
Patients and methods: We recruited all consecutive patients with ESUS who received implantation after neurological adjudication of Reveal LINQ® loop recorder between January 2016 and July 2020. We collected demographic, clinical, heart- and neuroimaging, laboratory, and electrocardiographic data assessed on prolonged baseline ECG monitoring, number of supraventricular (SVEs) and ventricular (VEs) extrasystolic complexes, and from preimplantation ECG-PQ interval. AFib detection was manually supervised and determined positive when the duration was over 120 s.
Results: We followed a total of 131 patients for a median of 504 days. There were 45 (34%) manually verified AFib diagnoses. In univariate analysis, earlier implantation after ESUS was associated with AFib detection (13 vs. 31 days, p = 0.011). In multivariate analysis, increased rate of AFib was associated with a more prolonged PQ interval (per 50-ms increase) (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.39-2.85) and number of SVEs (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05-1.57) measured on pre-implantation ECG.
Conclusion: We observed similar predictors for Afib after ESUS, albeit with higher frequency than previously reported. This study suggests that the neurologist-led decision, management, and evaluation of ILR after ESUS is feasible.
Keywords: PQ interval; atrial fibrillation; embolic stroke of undetermined source; ischemic stroke (IS); loop recorder.
Copyright © 2022 Pikija, Rösler, Leitner, Zellner, Bubel, Ganser, Hecker and Mutzenbach.