Comparison of individual hive and apiary-level sample types for spores of Paenibacillus larvae in Saskatchewan honey bee operations

PLoS One. 2022 Feb 7;17(2):e0263602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263602. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Three commercial honey bee operations in Saskatchewan, Canada, with outbreaks of American foulbrood (AFB) and recent or ongoing metaphylactic antibiotic use were intensively sampled to detect spores of Paenibacillus larvae during the summer of 2019. Here, we compared spore concentrations in different sample types within individual hives, assessed the surrogacy potential of honey collected from honey supers in place of brood chamber honey or adult bees within hives, and evaluated the ability of pooled, extracted honey to predict the degree of spore contamination identified through individual hive testing. Samples of honey and bees from hives within apiaries with a recent, confirmed case of AFB in a single hive (index apiaries) and apiaries without clinical evidence of AFB (unaffected apiaries), as well as pooled, apiary-level honey samples from end-of-season extraction, were collected and cultured to detect and enumerate spores. Only a few hives were heavily contaminated by spores in any given apiary. All operations were different from one another with regard to both the overall degree of spore contamination across apiaries and the distribution of spores between index apiaries and unaffected apiaries. Within operations, individual hive spore concentrations in unaffected apiaries were significantly different from index apiaries in the brood chamber (BC) honey, honey super (HS) honey, and BC bees of one of three operations. Across all operations, BC honey was best for discriminating index apiaries from unaffected apiaries (p = 0.001), followed by HS honey (p = 0.06), and BC bees (p = 0.398). HS honey positively correlated with both BC honey (rs = 0.76, p < 0.0001) and bees (rs = 0.50, p < 0.0001) and may be useful as a surrogate for either. Spore concentrations in pooled, extracted honey seem to have predictive potential for overall spore contamination within each operation and may have prognostic value in assessing the risk of future AFB outbreaks at the apiary (or operation) level.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animal Diseases / diagnosis
  • Animal Diseases / epidemiology
  • Animal Diseases / prevention & control
  • Animals
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Beekeeping / statistics & numerical data
  • Bees / microbiology*
  • Colony Collapse / microbiology
  • Colony Collapse / prevention & control
  • Disease Outbreaks
  • Food Analysis
  • Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections / diagnosis
  • Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections / epidemiology
  • Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections / prevention & control
  • Honey / analysis
  • Honey / microbiology*
  • Paenibacillus larvae / isolation & purification
  • Paenibacillus larvae / physiology*
  • Saskatchewan / epidemiology
  • Seasons
  • Spores, Bacterial / isolation & purification*

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents

Grants and funding

This work was supported by: 1) Saskatchewan Agriculture Development Fund (20180249, ES), https://www.saskatchewan.ca/business/agriculture-natural-resources-and-industry/agribusiness-farmers-and-ranchers/agricultural-research-programs/knowledge-creation/agriculture-development-fund 2) Mitacs Accelerate (IT17216, ES) https://discover.mitacs.ca/accelerate/?gclid=CjwKCAjwsNiIBhBdEiwAJK4khu6Hbd67sxAmNBAyMtIOJvGTJIsXxwDwNokNplQ9wgbf4PZxos9T7BoCbacQAvD_BwE 3) Saskatchewan Beekeepers Development Commission (number not available, ES), https://saskbeekeepers.com/ 4) WCVM Interprovincial Graduate Fellowship (number not available, MZ) 5) Project Apis m. Christi Heintz Memorial Scholarship (number not available, MZ) The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.