The objective was to evaluate the predictive performance of the Colorectal Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (CCRAT) and three polygenic risk scores (Hsu et al., 2015; Law et al., 2019, Archambault et al., 2020) to predict the occurrence of colorectal cancer at five years in a Quebec population-based cohort. By using the CARTaGENE cohort, we computed the absolute risk of colorectal cancer with the CCRAT model, the polygenic risk scores (PRS) and combined clinico-genetic models (CCRAT + PRS). We also tailored the CCRAT model by using the marginal age-specific colorectal incidence rates in Canada and the risk score distribution. We reported the calibration and the discrimination. Performances of the PRSs, combined and tailored CCRAT models were compared to the original CCRAT model. The expected-to-observed ratio of the original CCRAT model was 0.54 [0.43-0.68]. The c-index was 74.79 [68.3-80.5]. The tailored CCRAT model improved the expected-to-observed ratio (0.74 [0.59-0.94]) and c-index (76.39 [69.7-82.1]). All PRS improved the expected-to-observed ratios (around 0.83, confidence intervals including one). PRSs' c-indexes were not significantly different from CCRAT models. Results from the combined models were close to those from the PRS models, Archambault combined model's c-index being significantly higher than the original and tailored CCRAT models (78.67 [70.8-86.5]; p < 0.001 and p = 0.028, respectively). In this Quebec cohort, CCRAT model has a good discrimination with a poor calibration. While the tailored CCRAT provides some gain in calibration, clinico-genetic models improved both calibration and discrimination. However, better calibrations must be obtained before a practical use among the inhabitants of Quebec province.
Keywords: Accuracy; CCRAT; Colorectal cancer occurrence; Model calibration; Model discrimination; Polygenic risk score (PRS).
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.