Purpose: To estimate the fatigue life of 3-unit molar fixed partial dentures (FPDs) made from two different monolithic ceramic systems, zirconia cercon (ZC) and lithium disilicate (LD). The effect of the connector size on the fatigue resistance of the monolithic FPD was also investigated.
Methods: Two models for the FPDs were built, a 3-unit all-ceramic and a porcelain-fused-to-metal. The porcelain-fused-to-metal FPD model was used as the control. Actual 3-unit FPDs (replacing the second lower premolar) were constructed using a computer aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) system. Finite element analysis (FEA) was executed. A hemispherical indenter was used to simulate occlusal load. The occlusal load phase of the chewing cycle was applied at the premolar pontic.
Results: The failure location for the monolithic FPD was always located at the distal connector. Connector size played a key role in determining the long-term survival of the prosthesis. The fatigue resistance was predicted to be 670 N for the ZC with a connector size 4 × 3 mm, while it was only 226 N for LD. As for porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM), FEA predicts that fatigue resistance can reach up to 770 N. Under the cyclic load of 670 N, the fatigue life for the zirconia FPD with connector size 4 × 3 mm was 2.23 × 106 cycles while it survived only 3.1 × 105 cycles when the connector was reduced to 3.5 × 2.5 mm. The angle of the oblique load has a significant effect on the stress distribution.
Conclusion: 3-unit monolithic FPDs made of ZC have superior fatigue performance compared to those made of LD. The fatigue life of the zirconia FPD was about three times longer than that made of LD with a connector size of 4 mm × 3 mm. The survival rates of ZC FPDs are comparable to porcelain-fused-to-metal. A significant reduction in fatigue strength is predicted for reduced connector size. Therefore, it is necessary to establish general guidelines for the minimum connector size.
Keywords: 3-Unit fixed partial denture; FPD; connector size; fatigue; finite element method; monolithic ceramics.
© 2022 by the American College of Prosthodontists.