Objective: To compare the early and midterm clinical outcomes of patients undergoing two different surgical procedures (stentless biological Bentall [SBB] vs. valve-sparing David Reimplantation [VSDR]) for aortic root dilatation, with or without concomitant aortic valve pathology.
Methods: A population of 106 patients underwent aortic root replacement from 2004 to 2015 at our unit. Mean age at operation was 63.1 ± 10 years. The patients were retrospectively assigned to 2 groups according to surgical procedure. David operation was carried out in 52 patients (group A-VSDR) and stentless biological Bentall in 54 patients (group B-SBB). Preoperative characteristics were similar in the 2 cohorts, except for age and EuroSCORE. Mean follow-up time was 7.09 years (0.26-14.50 years), and 96% complete. Patients were evaluated and analyzed for intra-operative results and long-term clinical outcomes.
Results: Intraoperative mortality was 0% in both groups. Overall survival probability at 11 years was 91.8% in group A and 73.8% in group B (p = .004). Cardiac mortality at 11 years was similar in the 2 groups (p = .116). Freedom from structural valve deterioration at 11 years was 88.8% (VSDR) and 90.6% (SBB) [p = .689]. Freedom from reoperation at 11 years did not differ between the groups (83.6% VSDR vs. 98.5% SBB, p = .574). Freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 11 years was 76.7% (VSDR) versus 80.1% (SBB) (p = .542). Mean gradient at last follow-up was lower in VSDR group (8.13 vs. 11.70 mmHg, p < .001).
Conclusions: David reimplantation and stentless biological Bentall procedures achieve excellent and comparable results at midterm follow-up. David operations provide superior hemodynamic performance preserved over time and may be preferred in younger, active patients.
Keywords: Bentall operation; David operation; aortic root surgery.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.