Different cell imaging methods did not significantly improve immune cell image classification performance

PLoS One. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):e0262397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262397. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Developments in high-throughput microscopy have made it possible to collect huge amounts of cell image data that are difficult to analyse manually. Machine learning (e.g., deep learning) is often employed to automate the extraction of information from these data, such as cell counting, cell type classification and image segmentation. However, the effects of different imaging methods on the accuracy of image processing have not been examined systematically. We studied the effects of different imaging methods on the performance of machine learning-based cell type classifiers. We observed lymphoid-primed multipotential progenitor (LMPP) and pro-B cells using three imaging methods: differential interference contrast (DIC), phase contrast (Ph) and bright-field (BF). We examined the classification performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with each of them and their combinations. CNNs achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of ~0.9, which was significantly better than when the classifier used only cell size or cell contour shape as input. However, no significant differences were found between imaging methods and focal positions.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • B-Lymphocytes / cytology
  • Cells, Cultured
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Lymphocytes / cytology
  • Machine Learning
  • Microscopy / methods
  • ROC Curve
  • Stem Cells / cytology

Grants and funding

This work was supported by a project subsidised by the RIKEN Junior Research Associate program (to K. O.), the Special Postdoctoral Researchers Program of RIKEN (to T. O.) and MEXT KAKENHI Grant Number 18H05411 (K.S.). Epistra, Inc. provided support in the form of salaries for authors Taku Tsuzuki and Koichi Takahashi, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.