Purpose: Evidence regarding the performance of digital dentures (DDs) fabricated using 3D printing is insufficient. This study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction with conventional dentures (CDs) and DDs fabricated using 3D printing.
Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted between November 2017 and May 2020. In the CD-DD group, CDs were fabricated before DDs, while the protocol was reversed in the DD-CD group. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction, quantified using a 100-mm visual analog scale, which assessed chewing efficiency, pain, stability, retention, comfort, esthetics, ease of cleaning, phonetics, and general satisfaction. Secondary outcomes were quality of life (QOL), number of visits, time required for definitive denture fabrication, number of adjustment appointments, and time required for denture stabilization after denture delivery.
Results: Patient satisfaction with CDs was superior in terms of phonetics, ease of cleaning, stability, comfort, and general satisfaction. Secondary outcomes such as social disability and the number of clinic visits were significantly lower in patients with DDs. However, the two groups showed no significant differences in the other outcomes. Although patient satisfaction with DDs was inferior to that with CDs, 20% of patients preferred and used DDs (12 patients preferred CDs, and three patients opted for DDs).
Conclusion: Although patient satisfaction or QOL with DDs may be somewhat inferior to that with CDs, 20% of patients preferred and used DDs daily. Thus, DDs fabricated using 3D printing may have comparable practicality and efficacy to CDs.
Keywords: 3D-printed dentures; Crossover trial; Patient satisfaction.