Evaluation of efficacy of rituximab for membranous nephropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 studies

Nephrol Ther. 2022 Apr;18(2):104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.nephro.2021.10.002. Epub 2022 Jan 21.

Abstract

Introduction: The use of traditional immunosuppressive medicines for the treatment of membranous nephropathy is being challenged, owing to its limited efficacy and tolerability. Research on M-type phospholipase A2 receptor antibodies has provided a new way for evaluating the efficiency and prognosis of treatment of membranous nephropathy. However, the relationship between rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against CD20, and antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibodies and the drug regimen of rituximab for membranous nephropathy is uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of rituximab treatments in membranous nephropathy and compared the clinical effects of first-line and second-line rituximab therapies.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register ofControlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to find articles about rituximab treatment of patients with membranous nephropathy between January 2000 and August 2020. The outcomes included remission, antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibodies, relapse, and adverse events. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation criteria were used to evaluate the strength of evidence.

Results: A total of 723 participants from 11 trials were included in this meta-analysis. The other treatments included cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide, steroids, and non-immunosuppressive antiproteinuric treatment. Rituximab significantly improved cumulative remission (P=0.007; Odds Ratio [OR]=3.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.35-6.94) compared with other treatments. It significantly reduced relapse (P<0.00001; OR=0.06; 95% CI=0.02-0.19), antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibody levels (P=0.0009; SMD=-0.52; 95% CI=-0.83 to -0.21), and the proportion of patients positive for anti-PLA2R antibodies (P=0.003; OR=6.11; 95% CI=1.85-20.24) compared with other treatments. Compared with the second-line, first-line rituximab therapy achieved a higher rate of cumulative remission (P=0.03; OR=0.32, 95% CI=0.11-0.91).

Conclusions: Rituximab can improve the rate of clinical remission in patients with membranous nephropathy. Rituximab was more effective than other treatments in reducing relapse, antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibody levels, and the proportion of patients positive for antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibodies. The clinical remission rate following first-line rituximab therapy was better than that of second-line rituximab therapy for membranous nephropathy.

Keywords: M-type phospholipase A2 receptor antibodies; Membranous nephropathy; Meta-analysis; Rituximab.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Autoantibodies
  • Autoantigens
  • Cyclophosphamide / therapeutic use
  • Cyclosporine / therapeutic use
  • Female
  • Glomerulonephritis, Membranous* / drug therapy
  • Humans
  • Immunosuppressive Agents / therapeutic use
  • Male
  • Receptors, Phospholipase A2
  • Recurrence
  • Rituximab / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Autoantibodies
  • Autoantigens
  • Immunosuppressive Agents
  • Receptors, Phospholipase A2
  • Rituximab
  • Cyclosporine
  • Cyclophosphamide