Aims: Better documentation of vulvar pain is needed. We examined pain locations marked on general body and genital specific outlines among women with vulvodynia. Methods: 62 women (mean age 32.1 ± 9.5 years) with vulvodynia marked their pain on a digital genital specific outline (22 segments) and 59 of those women also marked their pain on a digital general body outline (48 segments). We used ImageJ software to determine body surface area (BSA) for each outline. Results: On the general body outline, 24/48 segments were marked; 22/22 segments were marked on the genital specific outline. There was a moderate correlation (r = 0.43; p = 0.001) between the BSA marked on the general body outline and the BSA marked on the genital area outline. Conclusions: Findings support concurrent validity of the BSA as a measure of pain location using either outline.
Keywords: PAINReportIt; pain tool; tool development; vulvar pain; vulvodynia.
Women with genital pain need to be able to show their healthcare provider where they have pain, and providers need to document where women have pain. In total, 62 women with vulvodynia used a computer tablet to mark their pain on a general body outline and a genital specific outline. We used computer software to document the location of women’s pain looking at percent body surface area. Women marked half of the segments on the general body outline and all the segments on the genital specific outline. Because women marked almost the same percent of body surface area on the general body outline as they did on the genital specific outline, percent body surface may be used to measure pain location.