Long-Term Beta-Blocker Therapy After Myocardial Infarction Without Heart Failure in the Reperfusion Era-Systemic Review and Meta-analysis

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2022 May 1;79(5):650-654. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000001221.

Abstract

Beta-blockers are recommended as a standard treatment for patients who experience a myocardial infarction (MI). However, the evidence supporting this recommendation is based on the prereperfusion era data. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of long-term (≥1 year) beta-blocker therapy in post-MI patients without clinical heart failure (HF) in the reperfusion era. We included observational cohort studies, which compared at least 1 year use of beta-blockers to no beta-blockers in patients with an acute MI, but without HF. The clinical endpoint considered was all-cause mortality, except for cardiovascular death in one study. Five cohort studies and 217,532 patients were included. One study demonstrated a reduction in all-cause mortality with beta-blockers, whereas, in 4 studies, there was no difference in the death rate. The pooled estimate by random effect showed that beta-blocker treatment does not reduce mortality (odds ratio 0.800, 95% confidence interval 0.559-1.145) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 94%). This meta-analysis shows that the use of oral beta-blockers for 1 year or more does not reduce the mortality of MI patients without HF. Large randomized trials need to evaluate beta-blocker discontinuation after an acute MI.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Adrenergic beta-Antagonists* / therapeutic use
  • Cohort Studies
  • Heart Failure / epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Myocardial Infarction* / drug therapy
  • Reperfusion
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Adrenergic beta-Antagonists