Aims: To retrospectively evaluate the quality of fit of 3D printed bolus over four different treatment sites to determine whether certain sites favor a 3D printed approach and if the quality of fit changes over the course of treatment.
Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of the first 60 cases treated using 3D printed bolus in our radiotherapy center was undertaken. All boluses were printed using flexible thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) material. We developed a system of rating the quality of fit using four quality categories. The analysis of 60 patients consisted of a review of a total 627 treatment fractions for head and neck (H&N), scalp, pelvis, and extremity treatment sites.
Results: Out of 627 fractions evaluated, 75.1% were rated either "good" or "excellent", 20.6% were rated as "acceptable" and 4.3% were rated "poor". H&N, scalp, and extremity treatment regions were found to favor a 3D printed approach. However, pelvis cases had a higher proportion of "acceptable" and "poor" ratings. Trend analysis showed no notable change in the quality of 3D printed bolus fit over the course of treatment, except for pelvis cases which tended to change categories more than other treatment sites.
Conclusion: This evaluation demonstrates that 3D printed bolus, created using semi-flexible materials such as TPU, is an effective and practical bolus choice for radiotherapy. In particular, using a 3D printed approach for H&N, scalp, and extremities was found to have a highly conformal fit.
Keywords: 3D printing; bolus; clinical application; radiotherapy.
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.