Health Care Providers' Attitudes Toward Do-Not-Resuscitate Order in COVID-19 Patients: An Ethical Dilemma in Iran

Omega (Westport). 2024 Feb;88(3):908-918. doi: 10.1177/00302228211057992. Epub 2022 Jan 18.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the health care providers' attitudes toward the Do-Not-Resuscitate order (DNR) in COVID-19 patients. This study was conducted on 332 health care providers (HCPs) at the COVID-19 referral hospital in Shahroud, Iran by convenience sampling method. The study tools included a demographic information form and the DNR attitude questionnaire. Significance level was considered 0.05 for all tests. The mean scores of attitudes toward DNR order, the procedure of DNR, some aspects of passive euthanasia, and religious and cultural factors were 25.27 ± 2.78, 40.61 ± 5.99, 11.26 ± 2.51, and 6.12 ± 1.27, respectively. The death of relatives due to COVID-19 and female gender were associated with high and low scores of attitudes toward DNR order, respectively. Extended working hours and more work experience were correlated with high scores of DNR procedure. The history of COVID-19 increased the mean score of attitudes toward some aspects of passive euthanasia. In addition, an increase in following COVID-19 news decreased the score of religious and cultural factors affecting DNR order. Despite the legal ban on implementation of the DNR in Iran, the attitude of Iranian HCPs toward this was positive in COVID-19 patients.

Keywords: COVID-19; CPR; DNR; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; do not resuscitate.

MeSH terms

  • COVID-19*
  • Euthanasia, Passive
  • Female
  • Health Personnel
  • Humans
  • Iran
  • Resuscitation Orders*