Beyond the prey: male spiders highly invest in silk when producing worthless gifts

PeerJ. 2022 Jan 5:10:e12757. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12757. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

In the spider Paratrechalea ornata, males have two gift-giving mating tactics, offering either a nutritive (prey) or a worthless (prey leftovers) silk wrapped gift to females. Both gift types confer similar mating success and duration and afford males a higher success rate than when they offer no gift. If this lack of difference in the reproductive benefits is true, we would expect all males to offer a gift but some males to offer a worthless gift even if prey are available. To test this, we allowed 18 males to court multiple females over five consecutive trials. In each trial, a male was able to produce a nutritive gift (a live housefly) or a worthless gift (mealworm exuviae). We found that, in line with our predictions, 20% of the males produced worthless gifts even when they had the opportunity to produce a nutritive one. However, rather than worthless gifts being a cheap tactic, they were related to a higher investment in silk wrapping. This latter result was replicated for worthless gifts produced in both the presence and absence of a live prey item. We propose that variation in gift-giving tactics likely evolved initially as a conditional strategy related to prey availability and male condition in P. ornata. Selection may then have favoured silk wrapping as a trait involved in female attraction, leading worthless gift-giving to invade.

Keywords: Deceptive tactics; Gift-giving behaviour; Male choice; Silk wrapping investment.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Female
  • Gift Giving
  • Male
  • Reproduction
  • Sexual Behavior, Animal*
  • Silk
  • Spiders*

Substances

  • Silk

Grants and funding

Maria J. Albo was supported by Caldeyro-Barcia National Science Award (MJA), PEDECIBA, and Postdoctoral fellowship IIBCE, Uruguay. Camila Pavón-Peláez was supported by Animal Behavior Society (USA). Valentina Franco-Trecu was supported by Postdoctoral fellowship PEDECIBA, Uruguay. Maria J. Albo and Valentina Franco-Trecu were funded by ANII (SNI). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.