The use of direct and indirect speech across psychological distance

Mem Cognit. 2022 Nov;50(8):1816-1825. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01267-x. Epub 2022 Jan 14.

Abstract

The current study investigated how psychological distance affects people's preference for direct and indirect speech in a narrative task. In three experiments, participants were instructed to first watch a video and then retell what happened in the video to an imagined/anticipated listener. We manipulated social distance (Experiment 1), temporal distance (Experiment 2), and spatial distance (Experiment 3) between participants and the listener. We compared the proportions of direct speech in the narrations from psychologically proximal versus distal conditions. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that social and temporal proximity increased the rates of direct speech. Social and temporal distance, conversely, increased the rates of indirect speech. Experiment 3 did not yield a significant difference in the use of direct and indirect speech between spatially proximal and distal conditions. Taken together, our results indicate that different psychological dimensions might have discrepant effects on people's choices between direct and indirect speech. Possible explanations for the discrepancy among different psychological distance dimensions are discussed.

Keywords: Construal level theory; Direct speech; Indirect speech; Psychological distance.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Narration
  • Psychological Distance*
  • Speech*