Background: There have been several reports about the prognosis of teeth adjacent to edentulous spaces for implant-supported fixed prostheses (ISFPs) and removable partial dentures (RPDs). However, there are few reports about the prognosis of the other remaining teeth comparing ISFPs with RPDs.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the prognosis of the remaining teeth for ISFPs and RPDs in terms of survival and complication-free rates.
Methods: Subjects were partially edentulous patients with ISFPs or RPDs inserted in 2003-2016. Teeth adjacent to edentulous spaces (A-teeth), teeth not adjacent to edentulous spaces (R-teeth), and teeth opposing edentulous spaces (O-teeth) were investigated. The endpoints were tooth extraction and complications. A multivariate cox regression model was used to estimate the risk factors for survival of the investigated teeth.
Results: A total of 233 (ISFP: 89, RPD: 144) patients were included in the statistical analyses. An IFSP prosthesis, when compared to an RPD prosthesis did not significantly decrease the tooth loss rate for A-teeth (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-1.92), for R-teeth (HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.28-1.05), or for O-teeth (HR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.10-2.09).
Conclusions: In partially edentulous spaces, the difference between ISFPs and RPDs does not affect the prognosis of teeth adjacent to edentulous spaces, teeth not adjacent to edentulous spaces, and teeth opposing edentulous spaces. Namely, our findings suggest that it depends largely on the tooth type, jaw, endodontic therapy performed, not on the type of prostheses.
Keywords: adjacent teeth; complication-free rates; implant-supported fixed prostheses; opposing teeth; removable partial dentures; retrospective study; survival rates.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.