Light and moderate intensity physical activity are associated with better ambulation, quality of life, and vascular measurements in patients with claudication

J Vasc Surg. 2022 May;75(5):1739-1749. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.12.071. Epub 2022 Jan 7.

Abstract

Objective: We sought to determine whether patients with claudication who reported performing either light intensity physical activity (LPA) or moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) would have higher levels of objectively determined physical activity and better physical function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and vascular measures, consisting of exercise time to minimum calf muscle oxygen saturation (StO2) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, than patients who reported being physically sedentary.

Methods: A total of 269 patients were assessed using the Johnson Space Center physical activity scale. The patients were grouped according to whether they performed no physical activities (n = 75), LPAs (n = 140), or MVPAs (n = 54). The primary measurements were the total daily steps obtained from a step activity monitor worn for 1 week, peak walking time obtained from a treadmill test, physical function score on the Medical Outcomes Study short-form 36-item survey to assess HRQoL, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.

Results: The total daily steps was significantly different among the groups. Both the LPA group (mean ± standard deviation, 7878 ± 2808 steps/d) and the MVPA group (mean, 8551 ± 3365 steps/d) had taken more daily steps (P < .01) than had the sedentary group (mean, 3323 ± 986 steps/d). The treadmill peak walking time was significantly different among the three groups. Both the LPA group (433 ± 296 seconds) and the MVPA group (548 ± 300 seconds) had had a greater peak walking time (P < .01) than that of the sedentary group (302 ± 210 seconds). The physical function score was also significantly different among the groups. The LPA group (44% ± 20%) and MVPA group (58% ± 19%) both had had higher scores (P < .01) than the sedentary group (36% ± 20%). In addition, the exercise time to the minimum calf muscle StO2 was significantly different among the groups. Both the LPA group (215 ± 238 seconds) and the MVPA group (377 ± 351 seconds) had had greater values (P < .05 and P < .01, respectively) than the sedentary group (147 ± 172 seconds). Finally, the high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level was significantly different among the groups. Both the LPA group (4.8 ± 5.5 mg/L) and the MVPA group (3.5 ± 3.6 mg/L) had had lower values (P < .01) than the sedentary group (8.6 ± 8.4 mg/L).

Conclusions: Patients with claudication who reported performing LPA had greater amounts of objectively determined physical activity levels and better physical function, HRQoL, and vascular measures than those who reported being physically sedentary. Furthermore, these favorable results associated with LPA were even more pronounced for the patients who performed MVPA compared with those who were sedentary. The clinical significance is that our results have shown that engaging in any physical activity, even at relatively light intensity, is associated with favorable health and vascular measures for patients with claudication.

Keywords: Exercise; Inflammation; Microvascular; Near-infrared spectroscopy; Peripheral artery disease; Physical activity monitoring.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • C-Reactive Protein*
  • Exercise / physiology
  • Humans
  • Intermittent Claudication / diagnosis
  • Quality of Life*
  • Walking

Substances

  • C-Reactive Protein