Cost impact analysis of novel host-response diagnostic for patients with community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department

J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):138-151. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2026686.

Abstract

Background: There is significant over-prescription of antibiotics for suspected community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients as bacterial and viral pathogens are difficult to differentiate. To address this issue, a host response diagnostic called MeMed BV (MMBV) was developed that accurately differentiates bacterial from viral infection at the point of need by integrating measurements of multiple biomarkers. A literature-based cost-impact model was developed that compared the cost impact and clinical benefits between using the standard of care diagnostics combined with MMBV relative to standard of care diagnostics alone.

Methods: The patient population was stratified according to the pneumonia severity index, and cost savings were considered from payer and provider perspectives. Four scenarios were considered. The main analysis considers the cost impact of differences in antibiotic stewardship and resulting adverse events. The first, second, and third scenarios combine the impacts on antibiotic stewardship with changes in hospital admission probability, length of hospital stay and diagnosis related group (DRG) reallocation, and hospital admission probability, length of stay, and DRG reallocation in combination, respectively.

Results: The main analysis results show overall per-patient savings of $37 for payers and $223 for providers. Scenarios 1, 2, and 3 produced savings of $137, $189, and $293 for payers, and $339, $713, and $809 for providers, respectively.

Limitations: Models are simulations of real-world clinical processes, and are not sensitive to variations in clinical practice driven by differences in physician practice styles, differences in facility-level practice patterns, and patient comorbidities expected to exacerbate the clinical impact of CAP. Hospital models are limited to costs and do not consider differences in revenue associated with each approach.

Conclusions: Introducing MMBV to the current SOC diagnostic process is likely to be cost-saving to both hospitals and payers when considering impacts on antibiotic distribution, hospital admission rate, hospital LOS, and DRG reallocation.

Keywords: Community-acquired pneumonia; I; I1; I10; I15; cost-impact; diagnostics; economics; host response; infection; lower respiratory tract infection.

MeSH terms

  • Antimicrobial Stewardship*
  • Community-Acquired Infections* / diagnosis
  • Community-Acquired Infections* / drug therapy
  • Cost Savings
  • Emergency Service, Hospital
  • Humans
  • Pneumonia* / diagnosis
  • Pneumonia* / drug therapy