Which will carry more weight when CTR > 0.5, solid component size, CTR, tumor size or SUVmax?

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted to explore the clinical significance of the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) in the clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with tumor size ≤ 2 cm and consolidation to tumor ratio (CTR) > 0.5.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent surgeries between January 2014 and March 2017. Clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma patients with tumor of size ≤ 2 cm and CTR > 0.5 were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups: part-solid and pure-solid based on whether CTR = 1.0 or not. Nodules with any amount of solid or micropapillary components were regarded as the high-risk subtype. Time-dependent ROC curve was used to determine the best cut-off value. Finally, we analyzed the relationship between SUVmax, high-risk subtypes, node metastasis and 5-year relapse-free survival and overall survival.

Results: Totally, 270 patients were included. The distribution of pathological subtypes (p < 0.001), SUVmax (p < 0.001), and pathological N stage (p < 0.001) were different between the two groups. Multivariable analysis indicated that SUVmax could predict high-risk subtypes in cases of part-solid nodules (p < 0.001) and both high-risk subtypes (p = 0.022) and node metastasis (p < 0.001) in cases of pure-solid ones. SUVmax ≥ 2.6 and SUVmax ≥ 5.1 were strongly associated with 5-year relapse-free survival (p < 0.001) and 5-year overall survival (p < 0.001) among all the patients, respectively.

Conclusion: Part-solid nodules with 0.5 < CTR < 1 and pure-solid nodules in lung adenocarcinoma show different clinicopathological characteristics, especially in SUVmax. SUVmax is significantly associated with high-risk subtypes, node metastasis, 5-year relapse-free survival and overall survival.

Keywords: 18F-FDG uptake; Lung adenocarcinoma; Pathological subtype; SUVmax.