In Silico Feasibility Study of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Head and Neck Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma

Edoardo Mastella; Silvia Molinelli; Giuseppe Magro; Stefania Russo; Maria Bonora; Sara Ronchi; Rossana Ingargiola; Alexandra D Jensen; Mario Ciocca; Barbara Vischioni; Ester Orlandi

doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.772580

In Silico Feasibility Study of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Head and Neck Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma

Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 13:11:772580. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.772580. eCollection 2021.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy.
² Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Gießen and Marburg (UKGM), Gießen, Germany.
³ FB20 (Medicine), Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Abstract

Purpose: In carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT), a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) approach has not been fully exploited so far. The feasibility of a CIRT-SIB strategy for head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) patients was investigated in order to improve treatment planning dose distributions.

Methods and materials: CIRT plans of 10 ACC patients treated at the National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO, Pavia, Italy) with sequential boost (SEQ) irradiation and prescription doses of 41.0 Gy [relative biological effectiveness (RBE)]/10 fractions to low-risk (LR) clinical target volume (CTV) plus 24.6 Gy(RBE)/6 fractions to the high-risk (HR) CTV were re-planned with two SIB dose levels to the LR-CTV, namely, 48.0 Gy(RBE) and 54.4 Gy(RBE). While planning with SIB, the HR-CTV coverage had higher priority, with fixed organ-at-risk dose constraints among the SIB and SEQ plans. The homogeneity and conformity indexes were selected for CTV coverage comparison. The biologically effective dose (BED) was calculated to compare the different fractionation schemes.

Results: Comparable HR-CTV coverage was achieved with the treatment approaches, while superior conformality and homogeneity were obtained with the SIB technique in both CTVs. With the SEQ, SIB_48.0, and SIB_54.4, the LR-CTV median doses were respectively 50.3%, 11.9%, and 6.0% higher than the prescriptions. Significant reductions of the median and near-maximum BEDs were achieved with both SIB dose levels in the LR-CTV.

Conclusions: The SIB approach resulted in highly conformal dose distributions with the reduction of the unintended dose to the LR-CTV. A prescription dose range for the LR-CTV will be clinically defined to offer tailored personalized treatments, according to the clinical and imaging characteristics of the patients.

Keywords: adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC); carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT); head and neck cancer; radiobiological models; simultaneous integrated boost (SIB).