Oscillometry or Forced Oscillation Technique, traditionally used in intermittent clinical measurements, has recently gained substantial attention from its application as a continuous monitoring tool for large and small airways. However, low frequency (<8 Hz) continuous oscillometry faces high breathing noise, and hence requires high oscillation amplitudes to maintain an acceptable signal-to-noise ratio. Therefore, PAP machines that utilize low frequency oscillometry do so intermittently to distinguish airway patency several seconds after a breathing pause has occurred. We hypothesized that high frequency and low amplitude (HFLA) oscillometry may be as sensitive and applicable for monitoring upper airway patency to distinguish between central and obstructive apnea and hypopnea events, and for monitoring respiratory impedance. An inline oscillometry prototype device was developed and connected to commercial PAP machines to test whether oscillometry at 17, 43, and 79 Hz are as sensitive to airway patency as oscillometry at 4 Hz. Analysis of 11 patients with 171 apneas and hypopneas showed that all frequency oscillometry inputs were equally sensitive in distinguishing between central and obstructive apneas, while 17 Hz and 43 Hz oscillometry were most sensitive in distinguishing between central and obstructive hypopneas. Observations during normal breathing also showed the same periodicity and cross-correlation between impedance measurements from HFLA oscillometry compared to 4 Hz. Our findings provide an unobtrusive means of distinguishing airway patency during sleep and a means of continuous monitoring of respiratory function, with the potential for detection and prediction of developing respiratory diseases and significantly richer context for data analytics.