Segmentation of viral genomes provides the potential for genetic exchange within coinfected cells. However, for this potential to be realized, coinfecting genomes must mix during the viral life cycle. The efficiency of reassortment, in turn, dictates its potential to drive evolution. The opportunity for mixing within coinfected cells may vary greatly across virus families, such that the evolutionary implications of genome segmentation differ as a result of core features of the viral life cycle. To investigate the relationship between viral replication compartments and genetic exchange, we quantified reassortment in mammalian orthoreovirus (reovirus). Reoviruses carry a 10-segmented, double-stranded RNA genome, which is replicated within proteinaceous structures termed inclusion bodies. We hypothesized that inclusions impose a barrier to reassortment. We quantified reassortment between wild-type (wt) and variant (var) reoviruses that differ by one nucleotide per segment. Studies of wt/var systems in both T1L and T3D backgrounds revealed frequent reassortment without bias toward particular genotypes. However, reassortment was more efficient in the T3D serotype. Since T1L and T3D viruses exhibit different inclusion body morphologies, we tested the impact of this phenotype on reassortment. In both serotypes, reassortment levels did not differ by inclusion morphology. Reasoning that the merging of viral inclusions may be critical for genome mixing, we then tested the effect of blocking merging. Reassortment proceeded efficiently even under these conditions. Our findings indicate that reovirus reassortment is highly efficient despite the localization of many viral processes to inclusion bodies, and that the robustness of this genetic exchange is independent of inclusion body structure and fusion. IMPORTANCE Quantification of reassortment in diverse viral systems is critical to elucidate the implications of genome segmentation for viral evolution. In principle, genome segmentation offers a facile means of genetic exchange between coinfecting viruses. In practice, there may be physical barriers within the cell that limit the mixing of viral genomes. Here, we tested the hypothesis that localization of the various stages of the mammalian orthoreovirus life cycle within cytoplasmic inclusion bodies compartmentalizes viral replication and limits genetic exchange. Contrary to this hypothesis, our data indicate that reovirus reassortment occurs readily within coinfected cells and is not strongly affected by the structure or dynamics of viral inclusion bodies. We conclude that the potential for reassortment to contribute to reovirus evolution is high.
Keywords: genetic exchange; inclusion bodies; mammalian orthoreovirus; reassortment; reovirus; segmentation.