Bayesian inference of local government audit outcomes

PLoS One. 2021 Dec 14;16(12):e0261245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261245. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The scandals in publicly listed companies have highlighted the large losses that can result from financial statement fraud and weak corporate governance. Machine learning techniques have been applied to automatically detect financial statement fraud with great success. This work presents the first application of a Bayesian inference approach to the problem of predicting the audit outcomes of financial statements of local government entities using financial ratios. Bayesian logistic regression (BLR) with automatic relevance determination (BLR-ARD) is applied to predict audit outcomes. The benefit of using BLR-ARD, instead of BLR without ARD, is that it allows one to automatically determine which input features are the most relevant for the task at hand, which is a critical aspect to consider when designing decision support systems. This work presents the first implementation of BLR-ARD trained with Separable Shadow Hamiltonian Hybrid Monte Carlo, No-U-Turn sampler, Metropolis Adjusted Langevin Algorithm and Metropolis-Hasting algorithms. Unlike the Gibbs sampling procedure that is typically employed in sampling from ARD models, in this work we jointly sample the parameters and the hyperparameters by putting a log normal prior on the hyperparameters. The analysis also shows that the repairs and maintenance as a percentage of total assets ratio, current ratio, debt to total operating revenue, net operating surplus margin and capital cost to total operating expenditure ratio are the important features when predicting local government audit outcomes using financial ratios. These results could be of use for auditors as focusing on these ratios could potentially speed up the detection of fraudulent behaviour in municipal entities, and improve the speed and quality of the overall audit.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms*
  • Bayes Theorem*
  • Financial Audit / methods
  • Financial Audit / standards
  • Financial Audit / statistics & numerical data
  • Fraud / economics
  • Fraud / prevention & control
  • Fraud / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Local Government*
  • Models, Statistical*
  • Monte Carlo Method

Grants and funding

Funding for this research was provided by Google PhD Fellowships and the National Research Fund of South Africa. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.