The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible effects of different vitrification systems on single vitrified blastocyst transfer cycles. The clinical and birth outcomes of 412 patients who underwent single vitrified blastocyst transfer between January 2018 and June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and compared between patients who underwent blastocyst vitrification with kit A (group A, 196 patients) and those who underwent blastocyst vitrification with kit B (group B, 216 patients). Clinical outcomes, including the clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate, late miscarriage rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, twin pregnancy rate, and induced labor rate due to fetal malformation, were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). The preterm delivery rate among singleton newborns (11.57% vs. 3.23%, P < 0.05) and the cesarean delivery rate were significantly higher in group B than in group A (70.25% vs. 57.26%, P < 0.05). Birth outcomes, including the male-to-female ratio, low-birth-weight rate, macrosomia rate, birth defect rate, newborn gestational age, neonatal body weight, and singleton neonatal body length, were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Our findings suggest that different vitrification systems might differentially affect birth outcomes. Such disparity could reflect differences in kit composition and/or protocol.ABBREVIATIONS: DMSO: dimethyl sulfoxide; ES: equilibration solution; VS: vitrification solution; BMI: body mass index; ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.
Keywords: Vitrification system; birth outcomes; cesarean delivery; clinical pregnancy; preterm delivery.