Effect of different tightening protocols on the probability of survival of screw-retained implant-supported crowns

Vinicius P Fardin; Edmara T P Bergamo; Dimorvan Bordin; Ronaldo Hirata; Estevam A Bonfante; Gerson Bonfante; Paulo G Coelho

doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105019

Effect of different tightening protocols on the probability of survival of screw-retained implant-supported crowns

J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022 Feb:126:105019. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105019. Epub 2021 Dec 2.

Authors

Vinicius P Fardin¹, Edmara T P Bergamo², Dimorvan Bordin³, Ronaldo Hirata⁴, Estevam A Bonfante¹, Gerson Bonfante¹, Paulo G Coelho⁵

Affiliations

¹ Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, University of São Paulo, Bauru College of Dentistry, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
² Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, University of São Paulo, Bauru College of Dentistry, Bauru, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: edmaratatiely@gmail.com.
³ Department of Restorative Dentistry, University Universus Veritas UNG, Guarulhos, SP, Brazil.
⁴ Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University College of Dentistry, USA.
⁵ Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University College of Dentistry, USA; Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, NYU Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

PMID: 34875501
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105019

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the effect of different tightening protocols on the probability of survival of screw-retained implant-supported anterior crowns.

Materials and methods: Seventy-two implants with internal conical connections (4.0 × 10mm, Ti-6Al-4V, Colosso, Emfils) were divided into four groups (n = 18 each): 1) Manufacturer's recommendations torque (25 N.cm for abutment's screw and 30 N.cm for crown's screw) (MaT); 2) Retightening after 10 min (ReT); 3) Torque 16% below recommended to simulate an uncalibrated wrench (AgT), and; 4) Temporary crown simulation (TeT), where crowns were torqued to 13 N.cm to simulate manual tightening, subjected to 11,200 cycles to simulate temporary crown treatment time (190 N), and then retightened to manufacturer torque (TeT). All specimens were subjected to cyclic fatigue in distilled water with a load of 190 N until 250,000 cycles or failure. The probability of survival (reliability) to complete a mission of 50,000 cycles was calculated and plotted using the Weibull 2-Parameter analysis. Weibull modulus and number of cycles at which 62.3% of the specimens would fail were also calculated and plotted. The failure mode was characterized in stereo and scanning electron microscopes (SEM).

Results: The probability of survival was 69.3% for MaT, 70% for ReT, 54.8% for AgT, and 40.3% for TeT, all with no statistically significant difference. Weibull modulus was approximately 1.0 for all groups. The characteristic number of cycles for failure was 105,000 cycles for MaT, 123,000 for ReT, 82,000 cycles for AgT, and 54,900 cycles for TeT, with no significant difference between groups. The chief failure mode for MaT, ReT, AgT groups was crown screw fracture, whereas abutment screw fracture was the chief failure mode for the TeT group.

Conclusion: Tightening protocol did not influence the probability of survival of the screw-retained anterior crowns supported by internal conical implants (Ti-6Al-4V, Colosso, Emfils).

Keywords: Biomechanics; Dental implants; Fatigue; Weibull analysis.

Publication types

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

Bone Screws
Crowns*
Dental Implants*
Dental Restoration Failure
Dental Stress Analysis
Probability
Reproducibility of Results
Torque

Substances

Dental Implants