Background: In recent years, pelvic restoration surgery is widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) as people pay more attention to postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). The therapeutic effect of pelvic restoration combined with anti-SUI surgery remains undetermined. The evaluation indicators of the therapeutic effects include the incidence of postoperative obstruction, the incidence of postoperative defecation difficulties, and the quality of life score.
Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched from the establishment of the database to April 2021 for randomized control trials (RCTs) of pelvic restoration and anti-SUI surgery, and the RevMan5.3 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used for meta-analysis.
Results: A total of 6 documents (a total of 1,944 patients) were included, including 1,021 patients in the experimental group and 923 patients in the control group. The incidence of obstruction after pelvic restoration combined with anti-SUI surgery was statistically significant (OR =1.35, 95% CI, 0.95-1.92, P=0.10); there was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative dyspareunia (OR =1.58, 95% CI, 0.91-2.74, P=0.10).
Discussion: A total of 8 documents included in this meta-analysis confirmed that pelvic restoration combined with anti-SUI surgery for PFD can improve the prognosis and quality of life of patients.
Keywords: Pelvic restoration; meta-analysis; pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD); surgery for stress urinary incontinence.