Intervertebral Foramen Width Is an Important Factor in Deciding Additional Uncinate Process Resection in ACDF-a Retrospective Study

Baifeng Sun; Chen Xu; Yizhi Zhang; Shenshen Wu; Huiqiao Wu; Hao Zhang; Xiaolong Shen; Zifan Zhang; Wen Yuan; Yang Liu

doi:10.3389/fsurg.2021.626344

Intervertebral Foramen Width Is an Important Factor in Deciding Additional Uncinate Process Resection in ACDF-a Retrospective Study

Front Surg. 2021 Nov 19:8:626344. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.626344. eCollection 2021.

Authors

Baifeng Sun¹, Chen Xu¹, Yizhi Zhang¹, Shenshen Wu^{1

2}, Huiqiao Wu¹, Hao Zhang¹, Xiaolong Shen¹, Zifan Zhang¹, Wen Yuan¹, Yang Liu¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Spine Surgery, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
² Department of Trauma and Joint, People's Hospital of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China.

Abstract

Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been established as a classic procedure for the management of cervical radiculopathy. However, it is unclear whether combined uncinate process resection (UPR) is necessary for treating cervical radiculopathy. Here, we investigated the clinical outcome of ACDF combined with UPR compared to ACDF alone to determine the necessity of UPR in treating cervical radiculopathy. Hypothesis: Uncinate process resection may be necessary in certain patients along with ACDF to achieve better clinical outcomes of cervical radiculopathy. Patients and Methods: Fifty-five patients underwent ACDF with UPR, and 126 patients without UPR were reviewed. The width and height of the intervertebral foramen were measured by 45° oblique X-rays. We also measured the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analog scale (VAS) score. C2-C7 Cobb angles were obtained from all patients pre- and post-operatively. Meanwhile, linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the clinical outcomes and the intervertebral foramen width before surgery. Results: Linear regression analysis indicated that the improvement in the JOA and VAS scores was irrelevant to both the pre-operative width of the intervertebral foramen (wIVF) and the height of the intervertebral foramen (hIVF) in the ACDF+UPR group. However, pre-operative wIVF was associated with post-operative JOA and VAS scores in the ACDF alone group. Those with pre-operative wIVF <3 mm in the ACDF group had the least improvement in post-operative clinical symptoms due to the change in wIVF (P > 0.05). The ACDF group whose wIVF was over 3 mm showed similar clinical outcomes to the ACDF + UPR group, and wIVF significantly increased post-operatively (P < 0.05). The fusion rate and C2-C7 Cobb angles did not show significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). Discussion: Our current findings suggest that UPR should be considered when wIVF is <3 mm pre-operatively. However, there is no need to sacrifice the uncovertebral joint in ACDF when the pre-operative wIVF is over 3 mm. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Keywords: anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; cervical radiculopathy; intervertebral foramen decompression; uncinate process resection; uncovertebral joint.