Development and field testing of a decision aid to facilitate shared decision making for adults newly diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

Yumi Aoki; Takashi Tsuboi; Yoshikazu Takaesu; Koichiro Watanabe; Kazuhiro Nakayama; Yasuhito Kinoshita; Mami Kayama

doi:10.1111/hex.13393

Development and field testing of a decision aid to facilitate shared decision making for adults newly diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

Health Expect. 2022 Feb;25(1):366-373. doi: 10.1111/hex.13393. Epub 2021 Dec 2.

Authors

Yumi Aoki¹, Takashi Tsuboi², Yoshikazu Takaesu^{2

3}, Koichiro Watanabe², Kazuhiro Nakayama¹, Yasuhito Kinoshita¹, Mami Kayama¹

Affiliations

¹ Graduate School of Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
² Department of Neuropsychiatry, School of Medicine, Kyorin University, Mitaka-shi, Tokyo, Japan.
³ Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.

Abstract

Background: The number of individuals who are diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) during adulthood has increased in recent years. However, there is still no decision aid (DA) to help adults newly diagnosed with ADHD make decisions regarding further treatments.

Objective: This study aimed to describe the development process of a DA for adults newly diagnosed with ADHD and its field testing during the shared decision-making (SDM) process in a clinical setting.

Methods: The development process involved the creation of a DA prototype using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards criteria and revision of the prototype through the stakeholders' reviews. The field testing of the DA compared scores before and after the SDM process on the service users' knowledge scale, decisional conflict scale and the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales.

Results: The developed DA contained options of watchful waiting with own coping skills and pharmacological treatment, which consisted of several kinds of drug options. Fifteen adults newly diagnosed with ADHD participated in the field testing. The participant decision-making quality outcomes such as their knowledge and decisional conflict improved after the SDM process. ADHD severity did not change.

Conclusion: A DA for adults with ADHD was systematically developed following the international criteria. Field testing indicated that the DA could serve as a tool to facilitate the SDM process. Further research on this DA is necessary before its routine implementation.

Patient or public contribution: During the development process of the DA, the service users who had already been diagnosed with ADHD reviewed the DA prototype and provided feedback, which improved the final version of the DA.

Keywords: attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder; decision aid; pre-post test; shared decision making; treatment decision making.

Publication types

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

Adult
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity* / diagnosis
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity* / therapy
Decision Making
Decision Making, Shared
Decision Support Techniques
Humans
Knowledge