Automated Stanford classification of aortic dissection using a 2-step hierarchical neural network at computed tomography angiography

Eur Radiol. 2022 Apr;32(4):2277-2285. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08370-2. Epub 2021 Dec 2.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of automatic Stanford classification of classic aortic dissection (AD) using a 2-step hierarchical neural network.

Methods: Between 2015 and 2019, 130 arterial phase series (57 type A, 43 type B, and 30 negative cases) in aortic CTA were collected for the training and validation. A 2-step hierarchical model was built including the first step detecting AD and the second step predicting the probability (0-1) of Stanford types. The model's performance was evaluated with an off-line prospective test in 2020. The sensitivity and specificity for Stanford type A, type B, and no AD (Sens A, B, N and Spec A, B, N, respectively) and Cohen's kappa were reported.

Results: Of 298 cases (22 with type A, 29 with type B, and 247 without AD) in the off-line prospective test, the Sens A, Sens B, and Sens N were 95.45% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.16-99.88%), 79.31% (95% CI, 60.28-92.01%), and 93.52% (95% CI, 89.69-96.25%), respectively. The Spec A, Spec B, and Spec N were 98.55% (95% CI, 96.33-99.60%), 94.05% (95% CI, 90.52-96.56%), and 94.12% (95% CI, 83.76-98.77%), respectively. The classification rate achieved 92.28% (95% CI, 88.64-95.04%). The Cohen's kappa was 0.766 (95% CI, 0.68-0.85; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Stanford classification of classic AD can be determined by a 2-step hierarchical neural network with high sensitivity and specificity of type A and high specificity in type B and no AD.

Key points: • The Stanford classification for aortic dissection is widely adopted and divides it into Stanford type A and type B based on the ascending thoracic aorta dissected or not. • The 2-step hierarchical neural network for Stanford classification of classic aortic dissection achieved high sensitivity (95.45%) and specificity (98.55%) of type A and high specificity in type B and no aortic dissection (94.05% and 94.12%, respectively) in 298 test cases. • The 2-step hierarchical neural network demonstrated moderate agreement (Cohen's kappa: 0.766, p < 0.001) with cardiovascular radiologists in detection and Stanford classification of classic aortic dissection in 298 test cases.

Keywords: Angiography; Aortic dissection; Computational neural networks; Feasibility studies; Machine learning.

MeSH terms

  • Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic* / diagnostic imaging
  • Aortic Dissection* / diagnostic imaging
  • Computed Tomography Angiography
  • Humans
  • Neural Networks, Computer
  • Prospective Studies
  • Retrospective Studies