Higher-Energy Hexafluoroisopropanol···Water Isomer and Its Large Amplitude Motions: Rotational Spectra and DFT Calculations

J Phys Chem A. 2021 Dec 9;125(48):10401-10409. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c09058. Epub 2021 Nov 30.

Abstract

Rotational spectra of the 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFIP)···water complex were measured using a chirped pulse Fourier-transform microwave spectrometer. The spectral analyses, aided by density functional theory calculations, reveal two HFIP···water isomers: one previously reported, trans HFIP (HFIPt)···water (Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 119, 5650-5657), and a new isomer, gauche HFIP (HFIPg)···water. To confirm the identity of the new isomer, rotational spectra of seven of its deuterated species were also measured and analyzed. Both the experimental and theoretical pieces of evidence indicate that the intermolecular interaction with water preferentially stabilizes the HFIPg monomer configuration over the global minimum configuration, HFIPt. The relative energy difference between these monomeric forms is 4.1 kJ mol-1 and decreases to 2.5 kJ mol-1 in the respective monohydrates at the B3LYP-D3(BJ)/def2-QZVP level of theory. Both rigid and relaxed potential energy surface scans were carried out to gain insights into the large-amplitude water motions in HFIPg···water. The nonobservation of a water tunneling splitting in HFIPt···water has been explained to be a result of a barrier-less (after zero-point-energy correction) pathway for the water motion, whereas in HFIPg···water, a relatively large water tunneling barrier was identified as the cause of barely resolved water tunneling splittings. Noncovalent interaction and quantum theory of atoms and molecule analyses were used to evaluate the changes in HFIPg···water when going from the minimum to the transition state in terms of attractive interactions such as the OH···H and OH···F contacts. The effect of fluorination is discussed by comparing the vastly different binding topologies of isopropanol···water and HFIP···water.