The effect of energy devices, nerve monitors, and drains on thyroidectomy outcomes has been examined for each tool independently. Current literature supports the routine use of energy devices and nerve monitors and does not support the routine use of drains. The effect of these operative tools is interrelated and should be examined concurrently. The aim of this study was to describe the risk-adjusted effect of each of these tools on thyroidectomy outcomes. A retrospective analysis of 17 985 open thyroidectomy procedures was conducted using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) 2016-2018 thyroidectomy targeted procedure database. All open thyroidectomies were included. The risk-adjusted effect of energy devices, nerve monitors, and drains on 30-day outcomes was calculated by multiple logistic regression. Energy devices were associated with a decreased risk of hematoma and decreased extended length of stay without increased risk of hypocalcemia or recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. Nerve monitors were associated with a decreased risk of overall morbidity, decreased recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, and decreased extended length of stay without an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Drains were associated with an increased risk of bleeding, reoperation, and extended length of stay without decreasing hematoma. Our results support the routine use of energy devices and nerve monitors for thyroidectomy and do not support the routine use of drains for thyroidectomy.
Keywords: ACS-NSQIP; bleeding; drain; energy device; hematoma; nerve monitor; outcomes; recurrent laryngeal nerve injury; thyroidectomy.
©Copyright 2021 by University Health Partners of Hawai‘i (UHP Hawai‘i).