The Short-Term Efficacy and Safety of Brentuximab Vedotin Plus Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin and Prednisone in Untreated PTCL: A Real-World, Retrospective Study

Adv Ther. 2022 Jan;39(1):532-543. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01943-z. Epub 2021 Nov 19.

Abstract

Introduction: Brentuximab vedotin (BV) showed high overall remission rates in refractory/relapsed classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL). Although the efficacy of BV has been reported in clinical trials, its efficacy as a frontline therapy in real world for patients with CD30 positive subtypes of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) such as peripheral T-cell lymphoma with T-follicular helper cell (TFH) phenotype (PTCL, TFH), anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) in China has not been well documented.

Methods: Analysis of a real-world, observational, retrospective case series in patients suffering from AITL, sALCL and peripheral T-cell lymphoma with T-follicular helper phenotype (PTCL-TFH) and other types of PTCL treated with BV in frontline treatment was conducted. The patients were given treatment from May 2020 till June 28, 2021. All patients were pathologically diagnosed to have PTCL before treatment and expressed CD30. Patients received BV (1.8 mg/kg) combined with CEP (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, prednisone acetate every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was objective response rates (ORR), and secondary endpoints were duration of response and incidence of adverse events (AEs). Exploratory endpoints such as progression-free survival (PFS) are discussed even though after such a short period.

Results: Nineteen patients completed ≥ 1 cycles of BV-CEP treatment (16 cases completed ≥ 4 cycles, 3 cases only completed 1 cycle). Among them, the ORR reached 89.5% [CR 52.7%; partial response (PR) 36.8%]. In the ALCL group, CR reached 100% with the median duration of response of up to 8 months, while in the AITL group, the ORR was 75% and 2 patients had disease progression after treatment with BV + CEP. We also observed that BV-CEP may extend the PFS compared to traditional chemotherapy such as the CHOEP regimen (BV-CEP: not evaluable, CHOEP: 6.5 months), although the median follow-up was only 6.7 months. Adverse events (AEs), including incidence and severity of febrile neutropenia (26% patients in the BV-CEP group and 30% in the CHOEP group), were similar between groups. There was no incidence of AEs leading to treatment withdrawal or death under BV-CEP treatment.

Conclusion: BV is a promising treatment in patients with ALCL, AITL and PTCL-TFH in frontline treatment settings.

Keywords: Brentuximab vedotin (BV); Cyclophosphamide; Epirubicin; Peripheral T cell lymphoma; Prednisone acetate (CEP).

Publication types

  • Observational Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols* / adverse effects
  • Brentuximab Vedotin / adverse effects
  • Cyclophosphamide / adverse effects
  • Epirubicin / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Lymphoma, T-Cell, Peripheral* / drug therapy
  • Prednisone / adverse effects
  • Retrospective Studies

Substances

  • Epirubicin
  • Brentuximab Vedotin
  • Cyclophosphamide
  • Prednisone