Real-World Performance of Susceptibility Testing for Ceftolozane/Tazobactam against Non-Carbapenemase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Jan 18;66(1):e0165721. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01657-21. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

Abstract

Ceftolozane/tazbactam (C/T) is a potent anti-pseudomonal agent that has clinical utility against infections caused by non-carbapenemase, producing-carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (non-CP-CR-PA). Accurate, precise, and reliable antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is crucial to guide clinical decisions. However, studies assessing the performance of different AST methods against non-CP-CR-PA (the main clinical niche for C/T), are lacking. Here, we evaluated performance of gradient strips (Etest and MIC test strip [MTS], and disk diffusion [DD]) using CLSI breakpoints. Additionally, we assessed the performance of DD using EUCAST breakpoints. For all susceptibility tests, we used a collection of 97 non-CP-CR-PA clinical isolates recovered from 11 Chilean hospitals. Both gradient strips and DD had acceptable performance when using CLSI breakpoints, yielding a categorical agreement (CA) of >90% and 92%, respectively. In contrast, DD using EUCAST breakpoints performed suboptimally (CA 81%). MTS yielded a higher essential agreement (EA, >90%) than Etest (84%). Importantly, the performance of all methods varied significantly when the isolates were stratified by their degree of susceptibility to other anti-pseudomonal β-lactams. All methods had 100% CA when testing isolates that were pan-susceptible to all β-lactams (Pan-β-S). However, the CA markedly decreased when testing isolates resistant to all β-lactams (Pan-β-R). Indeed, the CA was 81% for Etest (six errors), 78% for MTS (seven errors), and 78% and 56% for DD when using CLSI (seven errors) or EUCAST breakpoints (14 errors), respectively. Our results suggest that all manual AST methods have strikingly decreased performance in the context of Pan-β-R P. aeruginosa with potentially major clinical implications.

Keywords: Gram-negative bacteria; Pseudomonas; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; antibiotic resistance; antimicrobial activity; beta-lactams; bloodstream infections; carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa; ceftolozane/tazobactam; infectious disease; multidrug resistance; non-carbapenemase-producing; susceptibility testing.

MeSH terms

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Carbapenems / pharmacology
  • Cephalosporins / pharmacology
  • Humans
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
  • Pseudomonas Infections* / drug therapy
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa*
  • Tazobactam / pharmacology

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Carbapenems
  • Cephalosporins
  • ceftolozane
  • Tazobactam