Sectional matrix solutions: the distorted truth

Br Dent J. 2021 Nov;231(9):547-555. doi: 10.1038/s41415-021-3608-5. Epub 2021 Nov 12.

Abstract

Sectional matrix techniques offer more predictable solutions to achieving contact areas when placing direct interproximal posterior composites than circumferential matrix techniques, resulting in reduced reported complaints of food packing from patients. Despite this, a large majority of UK dentists and therapists don't currently use them. Sectional matrix systems are technique-sensitive to use, which can be a barrier to implementation for inexperienced users. The matrices can easily distort during their placement and stabilisation and when placing the restorative material. This can result in unwanted, clinically relevant problems in the resulting restorations, some of which may not be discernible once they have occurred. This paper explores the advantages and disadvantages of sectional matrices and the processes and techniques involved in their use, before discussing the potential for distortion at each step. It offers solutions to some of the commonly seen problems which will provide more predictable outcomes for those already using these techniques and encourage non-users to add them to their armamentarium.

MeSH terms

  • Composite Resins
  • Dental Cavity Preparation
  • Dental Materials
  • Dental Restoration, Permanent*
  • Humans
  • Matrix Bands*

Substances

  • Composite Resins
  • Dental Materials