Pressure Difference Estimation in Non-stenotic Carotid Bifurcation Phantoms Using Vector Flow Imaging

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2022 Feb;48(2):346-357. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.10.004. Epub 2021 Nov 9.

Abstract

Local pressure differences estimated using vector flow imaging (VFI) and direct catheterization in seven carotid bifurcation phantoms were compared with simulated pressure fields. VFI correlated strongly with simulated peak pressure differences (r = 0.99, p < 0.00001), with an average overestimation of 12.3 Pa (28.6%). The range between the lowest and highest pressure difference of VFI underestimated simulations by 4.6 Pa (8.06%; r = 0.99, p < 0.0001). The catheter method exhibited no correlation (r = -0.09, p = 0.85). Ten repeated measurements on one phantom revealed a small standard deviation (SD) for VFI (SD = 8.4%, mean estimated SD = 11.5%), but not for the catheter method (SD = 785.6%). An in vivo peak systolic pressure difference of 97.9 Pa (estimated SD = 30%) was measured using VFI in one healthy individual. This study indicates that VFI pressure difference estimation is feasible in phantoms and in vivo and realistic estimates of the SD can be attained from the data.

Keywords: Carotid bifurcation; Computational fluid dynamics; Fluid-filled pressure catheter; Fluid–structure interaction; Pressure difference estimation; Ultrasound; Vector flow imaging.

MeSH terms

  • Blood Flow Velocity
  • Carotid Arteries* / diagnostic imaging
  • Neck*
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Ultrasonography