Advanced CT techniques for hepatic microwave ablation zone monitoring and follow-up

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate utility of advanced CT techniques including HighlY constrained back-projection and dual-energy CT for intra- and post-procedure hepatic microwave ablation zone monitoring.

Methods: 8 hepatic microwave ablations were performed in 4 adult swine (5 min/65 W). Low-dose routine CECT and dual-energy CT images were obtained every 1 min during ablation. Images were reconstructed ± HYPR. Image quality and dose metrics were collected. 21 MWA were performed in 4 adult swine. Immediate post-procedure CECT was performed in the arterial, portal venous, and delayed phases using both routine and DECT imaging with full-dose weight-based IV contrast dosing. An additional 16 MWA were subsequently performed in 2 adult swine. Immediate post-procedure CT was performed with half-dose IV contrast using routine and DECT. 12 patients (10 M/2F, mean age 62.4 yrs) with 14 hepatic tumors (4 HCC, 10 metastatic lesions) treated with MWA were prospectively imaged with DECT 1 month post-procedure. 120 kV equivalent images were compared to DECT [51 keV, iodine material density]. Image quality and dose metrics were collected.

Results: Gas created during MWA led to high CNR in all intraprocedural CT datasets. Optimal CNRs were noted at 4 min with CNR 6.7, 15.5,15.9, and 21.5 on LD-CECT, LD-CECT + HYPR, DECT, and DECT + HYPR, respectively (p < 0.001). Image quality scores at 4 min were 1.8, 2.8, 2.4, and 3, respectively (p < 0.001). Mean radiation dose (CTDI_vol) was eightfold higher for the DECT series. For swine, post-procedural DECT images (IMD/51 keV) showed improved CNR compared to routine CT at all time points with full and with reduced dose contrast (CNR 4.6, 3.2, and 1.5, respectively, at half-contrast dose, p < 0.001). For human subjects, the 51 keV and IMD images showed higher CNRs (5.8, 4.8 vs 4.0, p < 0.001) and SNRs (3.7, 5.9 vs 2.8). Ablation zone sharpness was improved with DECT (routine 3.0 ± 0.7, DECT 3.5 ± 0.5). Diagnostic confidence was higher with DECT (routine 2.3 ± 0.9, DECT 2.6 ± 0.8). Mean DLP for DECT was 905.7 ± 606 mGy-cm, CTDI_vol 37.5 ± 21.2 mGy, and effective dose 13.6 ± 9.1 mSv, slightly higher than conventional CT series.

Conclusion: Advanced CT techniques can improve CT image quality in peri-procedural hepatic microwave ablation zone evaluation.

Keywords: Computed tomography; Dual Energy CT; HighlY constrained back projection (HYPR); Microwave ablation.