Reliability of cephalometric landmark identification on three-dimensional computed tomographic images

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Apr;60(3):320-325. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.07.003. Epub 2021 Jul 17.

Abstract

Our aims were to evaluate the reliability of three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric landmark identification in 3D images, and to propose an improved protocol for determining these landmarks. Computed tomographic (CT) images of 13 landmarks were obtained. One that did not show any artifacts, asymmetry in maxillofacial structures, or bony defects, was selected. Two orthodontic practitioners identified 3D cephalometric landmarks 10 times at one-week intervals. The distances of 26 landmarks were measured on the basis of three reference planes (coronal, horizontal, and sagittal). Ten mean (SD) measurements from each examiner were calculated, and the maximum and minimum values and the difference from the 10 measurements of each one were measured at a 95% confidence interval. Interexaminer differences for the three planes were found in the upper right first molar, point A, both gonions, left orbitale, and both porions. The lower right first molar, foramen magnum, gnathion, nasion, and pogonion showed interexaminer differences in two planes. Menton, basion, posterior nasal spine, upper and lower left first molar, and right mental foramen showed interexaminer differences in only one plane. With reference to intraexaminer differences, poor repeatability was observed for gonion, orbitale, condylion, and porion. Reliable 3D landmarks are the meeting point of sutures, distinct structures at converging planes, landmarks positioned in the midline, distinct anatomical structures such as the mental foramen, and teeth using multiplanar views.

Keywords: 3D cephalometrics; CT; Cephalometrics; Reliability.

MeSH terms

  • Anatomic Landmarks / diagnostic imaging
  • Cephalometry / methods
  • Cone-Beam Computed Tomography* / methods
  • Humans
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional* / methods
  • Observer Variation
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed