PET with Different Radiopharmaceuticals in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: An Umbrella Review of Published Meta-Analyses

Giorgio Treglia; Ramin Sadeghi; Francesco Giovinazzo; Federica Galiandro; Salvatore Annunziata; Barbara Muoio; Alexander Stephan Kroiss

doi:10.3390/cancers13205172

PET with Different Radiopharmaceuticals in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: An Umbrella Review of Published Meta-Analyses

Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 15;13(20):5172. doi: 10.3390/cancers13205172.

Authors

Giorgio Treglia^{1

2

3

4

5}, Ramin Sadeghi⁶, Francesco Giovinazzo⁷, Federica Galiandro⁷, Salvatore Annunziata⁸, Barbara Muoio⁹, Alexander Stephan Kroiss¹⁰

Affiliations

¹ Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland.
² Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
³ Academic Education, Research and Innovation Area, General Directorate, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland.
⁴ Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
⁵ Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.
⁶ Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 9919991766, Iran.
⁷ Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
⁸ UOC Medicina Nucleare, TracerGLab, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
⁹ Department of Medicine and Oncology, Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland.
¹⁰ Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.

Abstract

Background: Several meta-analyses have reported quantitative data about the diagnostic performance, the prognostic value, the impact on management and the safety of positron emission tomography (PET) including related hybrid modalities (PET/CT or PET/MRI) using different radiopharmaceuticals in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms. We performed an umbrella review of published meta-analyses to provide an evidence-based summary.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search of meta-analyses listed in PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases was carried out (last search date: 30 June 2021).

Results: Thirty-four published meta-analyses were selected and summarized. About the diagnostic performance: ⁶⁸Ga-SSA PET yields high diagnostic performance in patients with NETs and PGL; ¹⁸F-FDOPA PET yields good diagnostic performance in patients with intestinal NETs, PGL, NB, being the best available PET method in detecting rMTC; ⁶⁸Ga-exendin-4 PET has good diagnostic accuracy in detecting insulinomas; ¹⁸F-FDG PET has good diagnostic performance in detecting aggressive neuroendocrine neoplasms. About the prognostic value: ⁶⁸Ga-SSA PET has a recognized prognostic value in well-differentiated NETs, whereas ¹⁸F-FDG PET has a recognized prognostic value in aggressive neuroendocrine neoplasms. A significant clinical impact of ⁶⁸Ga-SSA PET and related hybrid modalities in patients with NETs was demonstrated. There are no major toxicities or safety issues related to the use of PET radiopharmaceuticals in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Conclusions: Evidence-based data support the use of PET with different radiopharmaceuticals in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms with specific indications for each radiopharmaceutical.

Keywords: PET; diagnostic performance; impact; meta-analysis; neuroendocrine; positron emission tomography; prognosis; umbrella review.

Publication types

Review